Skip to content

Stars, Sieves and Stories

Clients

According to the popular stereotype, foolish women comprised the majority of diviners’ clients. In a work lambasting fraudulent practitioners, the merchant John Melton described seeing ‘some twenty women’ and an ‘ancient man’ going to visit an astrologer. The old man told him that the women were ‘creatures so ignorantly obstinate, that neither the mild entreaty of a friend can persuade them from their follies, nor the bad report of an enemy dissuade them from their perverseness’ – before confessing that he, too, had lost money to the astrologer’s wiles.1John Melton, Astrologaster, or, The Figure-Caster (London, 1620), pp. 4-5. 

In reality, diviners had diverse clients. Men probably went more often than women. As well as going for their own sake, they might go in their capacity as the head of a household, or go on a woman’s behalf to save her from visiting a male stranger. People from all ranks of society used the services of diviners. When Anne Boleyn gave birth to the future Queen Elizabeth in September 1533, the diplomat Eustace Chapuys recorded that she ‘was delivered of a daughter, to the great regret both of [King Henry VIII] and the lady, and to the great reproach of the physicians, astrologers, sorcerers, and sorceresses, who affirmed that it would be a male child’. Chapuys added: ‘But the people are doubly glad that it is a daughter rather than a son, and delight to mock those who put faith in such divinations, and to see them so full of shame’.2Eustace Chapuys to Charles V in Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, Volume 6, 1533, ed. James Gairdner (London, 1882), p. 465.

Even though interest in divination reached society’s highest echelons, clients as well as diviners courted an element of risk. In 1669, James Hog and his servant John Wood of East Lothian were accused by local ministers of consulting an astrologer to find out who had stolen corn and cloth from Hog’s house. They were ‘sharply rebuked for their sin in going to consult with one whom they supposed a magician or wizard’.3National Records of Scotland (Edinburgh), Humbie kirk session minutes, 25 April 1669, CH2/389/1, p. 278. This was a merciful punishment: in Scotland, unlike in England or Wales, consulting a sorcerer was theoretically punishable by death.

Detail from a 1750 engraving of a fortune-teller reading the palm of the wife of the artist David Teniers the Younger.4Engraving by L. Surugue after David Teniers the Younger (1750), Wellcome Collection.

William Neville (1497-c.1545)5Edited documents in Frank Klaassen and Sharon Hubbs Wright, The Magic of Rogues: Necromancers in Early Tudor England (Pennsylvania, 2021), pp. 30-55.
Image references:
1) Woodcut from A Dialogue between a French and Irish Officer ([London], 1691), EBBA.
2) Woodcut from A Looking-Glass for Lascivious Young Men ([London], c. 1690), EBBA.
3) Detail of woodcut from The History of Mother Shipton (London, 1641), reproduced in John Ashton, Chap-books of the Eighteenth Century (London, 1882), p. 91, Google Books.
4) Woodcut from A Warning and Good Counsel to the Weavers ([London], 1688), EBBA.
5) Woodcut from Faithful Jemmy, and Constant Susan ([London], [1671-1702?]), EBBA.
6) Woodcut from The Judgment of God Shew’d upon Dr. John Faustus (London, [1688-1709?], EBBA.
and Goodwin Wharton (1653-1704):6Material from Wharton’s autobiography, British Library, Add. MSS 20006-7 (2 vols).
Image references:
1) Woodcut from A Dialogue between a French and Irish Officer ([London], 1691), EBBA.
2) Woodcut from An Answer to The Merchants Son of Exeter ([London], [1675-96?]), EBBA.
3) Woodcut from Ben Jonson, The Mad-merry Prankes of Robbin Good-fellow (London, [1601-1640?]), EBBA.
4) Woodcut of an angel appearing to a sleeping man, Wellcome Collection.
5) Woodcut from Martin Parker, A Warning for Wives (London, 1629), EBBA.
6) Woodcut from An Answer to the Advice to the Ladies of London ([London], [1685-8?]), EBBA.

A tale of two younger sons

maid

 A mid eighteenth-century engraving of a maid.7A. H. Payne after Jean-Étienne Liotard (c. 1743), Wellcome Collection.

In 1698, the Old Bailey heard a case of a maid decieved by a fortune-teller and her accomplices.8Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 20 July 1698.

John Adshed, alias Davenport, and John Holiday, were indicted for breaking the house of Edward Rowen on the 15th of June, and taking several pieces of stuff … It appeared that the prosecutor being from home, another woman prevailed with his maid to go abroad; and falling into a music-house, where was a pretended fortune-teller, they hearkened to her prophecy, and were told that the first man that should enter the room would be husband to the maid; and it happened, either by accident or contrivance, that Adshed was the first man that came in; who pretending much love and courtship to the maid, would needs see her home; which being admitted, he stayed late in the house; and next day coming again to renew his feigned courtship, carried the maid over the water, and into the Folly on the Thames [a coffeehouse], and in the evening returned home … and that night stayed till 11 o’ clock … next morning the door was found open, and the goods taken away…